A comparison of protraction-retraction of the distal limb during treadmill and water treadmill walking in horses

Kathryn Lefrancois, Kathryn Nankervis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

Abstract

The amount of protraction-retraction of the limbs during water treadmill walking has implications for postural and muscular development of horses undertaking this exercise for training and rehabilitation purposes. The objective of this study was to compare protraction-retraction of both forelimbs (FL) and hind limbs (HL) during dry treadmill (DT) and water treadmill (WT) exercise at the typical walking speed of each as used in practice. Inertial motion sensors attached to the metacarpal/metatarsal bones were used to compare maximal protraction (PROMAX), retraction (RETMAX) and total protraction-retraction range of movement (ROM) across five walking conditions: DT at 1.6 m/s; and WT at 0.8 m/s at four water depths, hoof depth (WTHOOF), fetlock depth (WTFET), hock depth (WTHOCK) and stifle depth (WTSTIFLE). FL ROM was lowest at WTSTIFLE and significantly lower than DT (P<0.001). HL ROM was highest at WTSTIFLE and significantly greater than DT (P<0.001). FL PROMAX was significantly lower at WTHOCK (P=0.001) and WTSTIFLE (P<0.001) than DT. HL RETMAX was higher at WTHOCK (P=0.001) than on DT and was significantly greater at WTSTIFLE and WTHOCK than WTFET (P<0.001 and P=0.001 respectively).Walking slowly (0.8 m/s) on a water treadmill reduces forelimb protraction-retraction ROM and increases hind limb protraction-retraction ROM when compared with walking at normal speed (1.6 m/s) on a dry treadmill. The potential for forelimb protraction to be decreased and hind limb retraction to be increased should be taken into account when designing training and rehabilitation programmes using this exercise modality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-62
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume70
Early online date22 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Stifle
exercise equipment
Animal Tarsus
limbs (animal)
Forelimb
walking
Horses
Walking
Extremities
horses
Water
forelimbs
hock
water
Rehabilitation
Hoof and Claw
Metacarpal Bones
Metatarsal Bones
Muscle Development
exercise

Keywords

  • Distal limb
  • Inertial motion sensor
  • Kinematics
  • Rehabilitation
  • Water treadmill

Cite this

@article{4f7fbd15693145b7a68262755d9bb8d8,
title = "A comparison of protraction-retraction of the distal limb during treadmill and water treadmill walking in horses",
abstract = "The amount of protraction-retraction of the limbs during water treadmill walking has implications for postural and muscular development of horses undertaking this exercise for training and rehabilitation purposes. The objective of this study was to compare protraction-retraction of both forelimbs (FL) and hind limbs (HL) during dry treadmill (DT) and water treadmill (WT) exercise at the typical walking speed of each as used in practice. Inertial motion sensors attached to the metacarpal/metatarsal bones were used to compare maximal protraction (PROMAX), retraction (RETMAX) and total protraction-retraction range of movement (ROM) across five walking conditions: DT at 1.6 m/s; and WT at 0.8 m/s at four water depths, hoof depth (WTHOOF), fetlock depth (WTFET), hock depth (WTHOCK) and stifle depth (WTSTIFLE). FL ROM was lowest at WTSTIFLE and significantly lower than DT (P<0.001). HL ROM was highest at WTSTIFLE and significantly greater than DT (P<0.001). FL PROMAX was significantly lower at WTHOCK (P=0.001) and WTSTIFLE (P<0.001) than DT. HL RETMAX was higher at WTHOCK (P=0.001) than on DT and was significantly greater at WTSTIFLE and WTHOCK than WTFET (P<0.001 and P=0.001 respectively).Walking slowly (0.8 m/s) on a water treadmill reduces forelimb protraction-retraction ROM and increases hind limb protraction-retraction ROM when compared with walking at normal speed (1.6 m/s) on a dry treadmill. The potential for forelimb protraction to be decreased and hind limb retraction to be increased should be taken into account when designing training and rehabilitation programmes using this exercise modality.",
keywords = "Distal limb, Inertial motion sensor, Kinematics, Rehabilitation, Water treadmill",
author = "Kathryn Lefrancois and Kathryn Nankervis",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jevs.2018.08.005",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "57--62",
journal = "Journal of Equine Veterinary Science",
issn = "0737-0806",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

A comparison of protraction-retraction of the distal limb during treadmill and water treadmill walking in horses. / Lefrancois, Kathryn; Nankervis, Kathryn.

In: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, Vol. 70, 01.11.2018, p. 57-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of protraction-retraction of the distal limb during treadmill and water treadmill walking in horses

AU - Lefrancois, Kathryn

AU - Nankervis, Kathryn

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - The amount of protraction-retraction of the limbs during water treadmill walking has implications for postural and muscular development of horses undertaking this exercise for training and rehabilitation purposes. The objective of this study was to compare protraction-retraction of both forelimbs (FL) and hind limbs (HL) during dry treadmill (DT) and water treadmill (WT) exercise at the typical walking speed of each as used in practice. Inertial motion sensors attached to the metacarpal/metatarsal bones were used to compare maximal protraction (PROMAX), retraction (RETMAX) and total protraction-retraction range of movement (ROM) across five walking conditions: DT at 1.6 m/s; and WT at 0.8 m/s at four water depths, hoof depth (WTHOOF), fetlock depth (WTFET), hock depth (WTHOCK) and stifle depth (WTSTIFLE). FL ROM was lowest at WTSTIFLE and significantly lower than DT (P<0.001). HL ROM was highest at WTSTIFLE and significantly greater than DT (P<0.001). FL PROMAX was significantly lower at WTHOCK (P=0.001) and WTSTIFLE (P<0.001) than DT. HL RETMAX was higher at WTHOCK (P=0.001) than on DT and was significantly greater at WTSTIFLE and WTHOCK than WTFET (P<0.001 and P=0.001 respectively).Walking slowly (0.8 m/s) on a water treadmill reduces forelimb protraction-retraction ROM and increases hind limb protraction-retraction ROM when compared with walking at normal speed (1.6 m/s) on a dry treadmill. The potential for forelimb protraction to be decreased and hind limb retraction to be increased should be taken into account when designing training and rehabilitation programmes using this exercise modality.

AB - The amount of protraction-retraction of the limbs during water treadmill walking has implications for postural and muscular development of horses undertaking this exercise for training and rehabilitation purposes. The objective of this study was to compare protraction-retraction of both forelimbs (FL) and hind limbs (HL) during dry treadmill (DT) and water treadmill (WT) exercise at the typical walking speed of each as used in practice. Inertial motion sensors attached to the metacarpal/metatarsal bones were used to compare maximal protraction (PROMAX), retraction (RETMAX) and total protraction-retraction range of movement (ROM) across five walking conditions: DT at 1.6 m/s; and WT at 0.8 m/s at four water depths, hoof depth (WTHOOF), fetlock depth (WTFET), hock depth (WTHOCK) and stifle depth (WTSTIFLE). FL ROM was lowest at WTSTIFLE and significantly lower than DT (P<0.001). HL ROM was highest at WTSTIFLE and significantly greater than DT (P<0.001). FL PROMAX was significantly lower at WTHOCK (P=0.001) and WTSTIFLE (P<0.001) than DT. HL RETMAX was higher at WTHOCK (P=0.001) than on DT and was significantly greater at WTSTIFLE and WTHOCK than WTFET (P<0.001 and P=0.001 respectively).Walking slowly (0.8 m/s) on a water treadmill reduces forelimb protraction-retraction ROM and increases hind limb protraction-retraction ROM when compared with walking at normal speed (1.6 m/s) on a dry treadmill. The potential for forelimb protraction to be decreased and hind limb retraction to be increased should be taken into account when designing training and rehabilitation programmes using this exercise modality.

KW - Distal limb

KW - Inertial motion sensor

KW - Kinematics

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Water treadmill

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/comparison-protractionretraction-distal-limb-during-treadmill-water-treadmill-walking-horses

U2 - 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.08.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.08.005

M3 - Journal Article

VL - 70

SP - 57

EP - 62

JO - Journal of Equine Veterinary Science

JF - Journal of Equine Veterinary Science

SN - 0737-0806

ER -