A comparison of protraction-retraction of the distal limb during treadmill and water treadmill walking in horses

Kathryn Lefrancois, Kathryn Nankervis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The amount of protraction-retraction of the limbs during water treadmill walking has implications for postural and muscular development of horses undertaking this exercise for training and rehabilitation purposes. The objective of this study was to compare protraction-retraction of both forelimbs (FL) and hind limbs (HL) during dry treadmill (DT) and water treadmill (WT) exercise at the typical walking speed of each as used in practice. Inertial motion sensors attached to the metacarpal/metatarsal bones were used to compare maximal protraction (PROMAX), retraction (RETMAX) and total protraction-retraction range of movement (ROM) across five walking conditions: DT at 1.6 m/s; and WT at 0.8 m/s at four water depths, hoof depth (WTHOOF), fetlock depth (WTFET), hock depth (WTHOCK) and stifle depth (WTSTIFLE). FL ROM was lowest at WTSTIFLE and significantly lower than DT (P<0.001). HL ROM was highest at WTSTIFLE and significantly greater than DT (P<0.001). FL PROMAX was significantly lower at WTHOCK (P=0.001) and WTSTIFLE (P<0.001) than DT. HL RETMAX was higher at WTHOCK (P=0.001) than on DT and was significantly greater at WTSTIFLE and WTHOCK than WTFET (P<0.001 and P=0.001 respectively).Walking slowly (0.8 m/s) on a water treadmill reduces forelimb protraction-retraction ROM and increases hind limb protraction-retraction ROM when compared with walking at normal speed (1.6 m/s) on a dry treadmill. The potential for forelimb protraction to be decreased and hind limb retraction to be increased should be taken into account when designing training and rehabilitation programmes using this exercise modality.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)57-62
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Equine Veterinary Science
    Volume70
    Early online date22 Aug 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

    Fingerprint

    Stifle
    exercise equipment
    Animal Tarsus
    limbs (animal)
    Forelimb
    walking
    Horses
    Walking
    Extremities
    horses
    Water
    forelimbs
    hock
    water
    Rehabilitation
    Hoof and Claw
    Metacarpal Bones
    Metatarsal Bones
    Muscle Development
    exercise

    Keywords

    • Distal limb
    • Inertial motion sensor
    • Kinematics
    • Rehabilitation
    • Water treadmill

    Cite this

    @article{4f7fbd15693145b7a68262755d9bb8d8,
    title = "A comparison of protraction-retraction of the distal limb during treadmill and water treadmill walking in horses",
    abstract = "The amount of protraction-retraction of the limbs during water treadmill walking has implications for postural and muscular development of horses undertaking this exercise for training and rehabilitation purposes. The objective of this study was to compare protraction-retraction of both forelimbs (FL) and hind limbs (HL) during dry treadmill (DT) and water treadmill (WT) exercise at the typical walking speed of each as used in practice. Inertial motion sensors attached to the metacarpal/metatarsal bones were used to compare maximal protraction (PROMAX), retraction (RETMAX) and total protraction-retraction range of movement (ROM) across five walking conditions: DT at 1.6 m/s; and WT at 0.8 m/s at four water depths, hoof depth (WTHOOF), fetlock depth (WTFET), hock depth (WTHOCK) and stifle depth (WTSTIFLE). FL ROM was lowest at WTSTIFLE and significantly lower than DT (P<0.001). HL ROM was highest at WTSTIFLE and significantly greater than DT (P<0.001). FL PROMAX was significantly lower at WTHOCK (P=0.001) and WTSTIFLE (P<0.001) than DT. HL RETMAX was higher at WTHOCK (P=0.001) than on DT and was significantly greater at WTSTIFLE and WTHOCK than WTFET (P<0.001 and P=0.001 respectively).Walking slowly (0.8 m/s) on a water treadmill reduces forelimb protraction-retraction ROM and increases hind limb protraction-retraction ROM when compared with walking at normal speed (1.6 m/s) on a dry treadmill. The potential for forelimb protraction to be decreased and hind limb retraction to be increased should be taken into account when designing training and rehabilitation programmes using this exercise modality.",
    keywords = "Distal limb, Inertial motion sensor, Kinematics, Rehabilitation, Water treadmill",
    author = "Kathryn Lefrancois and Kathryn Nankervis",
    year = "2018",
    month = "11",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jevs.2018.08.005",
    language = "English",
    volume = "70",
    pages = "57--62",
    journal = "Journal of Equine Veterinary Science",
    issn = "0737-0806",
    publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

    }

    A comparison of protraction-retraction of the distal limb during treadmill and water treadmill walking in horses. / Lefrancois, Kathryn; Nankervis, Kathryn.

    In: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, Vol. 70, 01.11.2018, p. 57-62.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A comparison of protraction-retraction of the distal limb during treadmill and water treadmill walking in horses

    AU - Lefrancois, Kathryn

    AU - Nankervis, Kathryn

    PY - 2018/11/1

    Y1 - 2018/11/1

    N2 - The amount of protraction-retraction of the limbs during water treadmill walking has implications for postural and muscular development of horses undertaking this exercise for training and rehabilitation purposes. The objective of this study was to compare protraction-retraction of both forelimbs (FL) and hind limbs (HL) during dry treadmill (DT) and water treadmill (WT) exercise at the typical walking speed of each as used in practice. Inertial motion sensors attached to the metacarpal/metatarsal bones were used to compare maximal protraction (PROMAX), retraction (RETMAX) and total protraction-retraction range of movement (ROM) across five walking conditions: DT at 1.6 m/s; and WT at 0.8 m/s at four water depths, hoof depth (WTHOOF), fetlock depth (WTFET), hock depth (WTHOCK) and stifle depth (WTSTIFLE). FL ROM was lowest at WTSTIFLE and significantly lower than DT (P<0.001). HL ROM was highest at WTSTIFLE and significantly greater than DT (P<0.001). FL PROMAX was significantly lower at WTHOCK (P=0.001) and WTSTIFLE (P<0.001) than DT. HL RETMAX was higher at WTHOCK (P=0.001) than on DT and was significantly greater at WTSTIFLE and WTHOCK than WTFET (P<0.001 and P=0.001 respectively).Walking slowly (0.8 m/s) on a water treadmill reduces forelimb protraction-retraction ROM and increases hind limb protraction-retraction ROM when compared with walking at normal speed (1.6 m/s) on a dry treadmill. The potential for forelimb protraction to be decreased and hind limb retraction to be increased should be taken into account when designing training and rehabilitation programmes using this exercise modality.

    AB - The amount of protraction-retraction of the limbs during water treadmill walking has implications for postural and muscular development of horses undertaking this exercise for training and rehabilitation purposes. The objective of this study was to compare protraction-retraction of both forelimbs (FL) and hind limbs (HL) during dry treadmill (DT) and water treadmill (WT) exercise at the typical walking speed of each as used in practice. Inertial motion sensors attached to the metacarpal/metatarsal bones were used to compare maximal protraction (PROMAX), retraction (RETMAX) and total protraction-retraction range of movement (ROM) across five walking conditions: DT at 1.6 m/s; and WT at 0.8 m/s at four water depths, hoof depth (WTHOOF), fetlock depth (WTFET), hock depth (WTHOCK) and stifle depth (WTSTIFLE). FL ROM was lowest at WTSTIFLE and significantly lower than DT (P<0.001). HL ROM was highest at WTSTIFLE and significantly greater than DT (P<0.001). FL PROMAX was significantly lower at WTHOCK (P=0.001) and WTSTIFLE (P<0.001) than DT. HL RETMAX was higher at WTHOCK (P=0.001) than on DT and was significantly greater at WTSTIFLE and WTHOCK than WTFET (P<0.001 and P=0.001 respectively).Walking slowly (0.8 m/s) on a water treadmill reduces forelimb protraction-retraction ROM and increases hind limb protraction-retraction ROM when compared with walking at normal speed (1.6 m/s) on a dry treadmill. The potential for forelimb protraction to be decreased and hind limb retraction to be increased should be taken into account when designing training and rehabilitation programmes using this exercise modality.

    KW - Distal limb

    KW - Inertial motion sensor

    KW - Kinematics

    KW - Rehabilitation

    KW - Water treadmill

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.08.005

    DO - 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.08.005

    M3 - Journal Article

    VL - 70

    SP - 57

    EP - 62

    JO - Journal of Equine Veterinary Science

    JF - Journal of Equine Veterinary Science

    SN - 0737-0806

    ER -