A Systematic Review of the Effect of Cognitive Strategies on Strength Performance

David Tod, Christian Edwards, Mike McGuigan, Geoff Lovell

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Researchers have tested the beliefs of sportspeople and sports medicine specialists that cognitive strategies influence strength performance. Few investigators have synthesised the literature. Objectives: The specific objectives were to review evidence regarding (a) the cognitive strategy–strength performance relationship; (b) participant skill level as a moderator; and (c) cognitive, motivational, biomechanical/physiological, and emotional mediators. Method: Studies were sourced via electronic databases, reference lists of retrieved articles, and manual searches of relevant journals. Studies had to be randomised or counterbalanced experiments with a control group or condition, repeated measures, and a quality control score above 0.5 (out of 1). Cognitive strategies included goal setting, imagery, self-talk, preparatory arousal, and free choice. Dependent variables included maximal strength, local muscular endurance, or muscular power. Results: Globally, cognitive strategies were reliability associated with increased strength performance (results ranged from 61 to 65 %). Results were mixed when examining the effects of specific strategies on particular dependent variables, although no intervention had an overall negative influence. Indeterminate relationships emerged regarding hypothesised mediators (except cognitive variables) and participant skill level as a moderator. Conclusions: Although cognitive strategies influence strength performance, there are knowledge gaps regarding specific types of strength, especially muscular power. Cognitive variables, such as concentration, show promise as possible mediators.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1589-1602
Number of pages14
JournalSports Medicine
Volume45
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Sports Medicine
Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Arousal
Quality Control
Databases
Control Groups
Power (Psychology)

Cite this

Tod, David ; Edwards, Christian ; McGuigan, Mike ; Lovell, Geoff. / A Systematic Review of the Effect of Cognitive Strategies on Strength Performance. In: Sports Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 45, No. 11. pp. 1589-1602.
@article{70a19772da0440f99ee9705d2de41edc,
title = "A Systematic Review of the Effect of Cognitive Strategies on Strength Performance",
abstract = "Background: Researchers have tested the beliefs of sportspeople and sports medicine specialists that cognitive strategies influence strength performance. Few investigators have synthesised the literature. Objectives: The specific objectives were to review evidence regarding (a) the cognitive strategy–strength performance relationship; (b) participant skill level as a moderator; and (c) cognitive, motivational, biomechanical/physiological, and emotional mediators. Method: Studies were sourced via electronic databases, reference lists of retrieved articles, and manual searches of relevant journals. Studies had to be randomised or counterbalanced experiments with a control group or condition, repeated measures, and a quality control score above 0.5 (out of 1). Cognitive strategies included goal setting, imagery, self-talk, preparatory arousal, and free choice. Dependent variables included maximal strength, local muscular endurance, or muscular power. Results: Globally, cognitive strategies were reliability associated with increased strength performance (results ranged from 61 to 65 {\%}). Results were mixed when examining the effects of specific strategies on particular dependent variables, although no intervention had an overall negative influence. Indeterminate relationships emerged regarding hypothesised mediators (except cognitive variables) and participant skill level as a moderator. Conclusions: Although cognitive strategies influence strength performance, there are knowledge gaps regarding specific types of strength, especially muscular power. Cognitive variables, such as concentration, show promise as possible mediators.",
author = "David Tod and Christian Edwards and Mike McGuigan and Geoff Lovell",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40279-015-0356-1",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "1589--1602",
journal = "Sports Medicine",
issn = "0112-1642",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "11",

}

A Systematic Review of the Effect of Cognitive Strategies on Strength Performance. / Tod, David; Edwards, Christian; McGuigan, Mike; Lovell, Geoff.

In: Sports Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 1589-1602.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Systematic Review of the Effect of Cognitive Strategies on Strength Performance

AU - Tod, David

AU - Edwards, Christian

AU - McGuigan, Mike

AU - Lovell, Geoff

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Background: Researchers have tested the beliefs of sportspeople and sports medicine specialists that cognitive strategies influence strength performance. Few investigators have synthesised the literature. Objectives: The specific objectives were to review evidence regarding (a) the cognitive strategy–strength performance relationship; (b) participant skill level as a moderator; and (c) cognitive, motivational, biomechanical/physiological, and emotional mediators. Method: Studies were sourced via electronic databases, reference lists of retrieved articles, and manual searches of relevant journals. Studies had to be randomised or counterbalanced experiments with a control group or condition, repeated measures, and a quality control score above 0.5 (out of 1). Cognitive strategies included goal setting, imagery, self-talk, preparatory arousal, and free choice. Dependent variables included maximal strength, local muscular endurance, or muscular power. Results: Globally, cognitive strategies were reliability associated with increased strength performance (results ranged from 61 to 65 %). Results were mixed when examining the effects of specific strategies on particular dependent variables, although no intervention had an overall negative influence. Indeterminate relationships emerged regarding hypothesised mediators (except cognitive variables) and participant skill level as a moderator. Conclusions: Although cognitive strategies influence strength performance, there are knowledge gaps regarding specific types of strength, especially muscular power. Cognitive variables, such as concentration, show promise as possible mediators.

AB - Background: Researchers have tested the beliefs of sportspeople and sports medicine specialists that cognitive strategies influence strength performance. Few investigators have synthesised the literature. Objectives: The specific objectives were to review evidence regarding (a) the cognitive strategy–strength performance relationship; (b) participant skill level as a moderator; and (c) cognitive, motivational, biomechanical/physiological, and emotional mediators. Method: Studies were sourced via electronic databases, reference lists of retrieved articles, and manual searches of relevant journals. Studies had to be randomised or counterbalanced experiments with a control group or condition, repeated measures, and a quality control score above 0.5 (out of 1). Cognitive strategies included goal setting, imagery, self-talk, preparatory arousal, and free choice. Dependent variables included maximal strength, local muscular endurance, or muscular power. Results: Globally, cognitive strategies were reliability associated with increased strength performance (results ranged from 61 to 65 %). Results were mixed when examining the effects of specific strategies on particular dependent variables, although no intervention had an overall negative influence. Indeterminate relationships emerged regarding hypothesised mediators (except cognitive variables) and participant skill level as a moderator. Conclusions: Although cognitive strategies influence strength performance, there are knowledge gaps regarding specific types of strength, especially muscular power. Cognitive variables, such as concentration, show promise as possible mediators.

U2 - 10.1007/s40279-015-0356-1

DO - 10.1007/s40279-015-0356-1

M3 - Journal Article

VL - 45

SP - 1589

EP - 1602

JO - Sports Medicine

JF - Sports Medicine

SN - 0112-1642

IS - 11

ER -