Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Optimal training requires understanding of exercise variables to achieve enhanced performance and progression. Rating of perceived exertion scales (RPE) are validated as proxy measures for physiological workload in human sport alongside Edwards’ training load. Edwards’ methodology is an algorithm using duration of time within defined heart rate (HR) zones. Both methods are validated to monitor Training load (TL) in human athletes. This study investigated if these methods could potentially offer a simple and repeatable measure of workload in equine training regimens. HR data (Polar V800) were obtained during one single exercise session from 32 horses across a range of equestrian disciplines with experienced riders and trainers, on different surfaces. Based on Edwards’ TL, duration (minutes) spent within five pre-defined training zones (1: <80; 2: 80-120; 3: 120-160; 4: 160-200; and 5: >200 bpm) were factored to obtain total TL (HRTL). Ratings (1:very,very easy-10:maximal) were collected from riders and trainers, reflecting horses’ RPE for entire sessions, then multiplied by exercise duration to determine internal TL (INHR). Spearman’s correlations (P<0.05) identified if relationships existed between HRTL and INHR. Statistically significant correlations between HR and INHR were found for both riders’ and trainers’ ratings of TL, riders: cohort: r=0.80, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.81, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.72, P=0.002; and trainers: cohort: r=0.82, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.89, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.94, P=0.0001. The results suggest HRTL and INHR can be used as inexpensive and easy tools to quantify TL and objectively assess progress in training. Exploration of optimal HR zone allocation for specific disciplines and breeds, alongside application of TL monitoring within equestrianism is warranted
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology
PagesS8
Number of pages1
Volume14
EditionSupplement 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Oct 2018
Event10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology - Lorne, Australia
Duration: 12 Nov 201816 Nov 2018

Publication series

NameComparative Exercise Physiology
PublisherWageningen Academic Publishers
ISSN (Print)1755-2540

Conference

Conference10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology
CountryAustralia
CityLorne
Period12/11/1816/11/18

Fingerprint

Horses
Heart Rate
Sports
Exercise
Workload
Proxy
Athletes

Cite this

Tabor, G., Marlin, D., & Williams, J. (2018). Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training? In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology (Supplement 1 ed., Vol. 14, pp. S8). (Comparative Exercise Physiology). https://doi.org/10.3920/cep2018.s1
Tabor, Gillian ; Marlin, David ; Williams, Jane. / Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training?. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology. Vol. 14 Supplement 1. ed. 2018. pp. S8 (Comparative Exercise Physiology).
@inproceedings{4bad4cc55bf74f208ac0db04930179fc,
title = "Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training?",
abstract = "Optimal training requires understanding of exercise variables to achieve enhanced performance and progression. Rating of perceived exertion scales (RPE) are validated as proxy measures for physiological workload in human sport alongside Edwards’ training load. Edwards’ methodology is an algorithm using duration of time within defined heart rate (HR) zones. Both methods are validated to monitor Training load (TL) in human athletes. This study investigated if these methods could potentially offer a simple and repeatable measure of workload in equine training regimens. HR data (Polar V800) were obtained during one single exercise session from 32 horses across a range of equestrian disciplines with experienced riders and trainers, on different surfaces. Based on Edwards’ TL, duration (minutes) spent within five pre-defined training zones (1: <80; 2: 80-120; 3: 120-160; 4: 160-200; and 5: >200 bpm) were factored to obtain total TL (HRTL). Ratings (1:very,very easy-10:maximal) were collected from riders and trainers, reflecting horses’ RPE for entire sessions, then multiplied by exercise duration to determine internal TL (INHR). Spearman’s correlations (P<0.05) identified if relationships existed between HRTL and INHR. Statistically significant correlations between HR and INHR were found for both riders’ and trainers’ ratings of TL, riders: cohort: r=0.80, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.81, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.72, P=0.002; and trainers: cohort: r=0.82, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.89, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.94, P=0.0001. The results suggest HRTL and INHR can be used as inexpensive and easy tools to quantify TL and objectively assess progress in training. Exploration of optimal HR zone allocation for specific disciplines and breeds, alongside application of TL monitoring within equestrianism is warranted",
author = "Gillian Tabor and David Marlin and Jane Williams",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.3920/cep2018.s1",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
series = "Comparative Exercise Physiology",
publisher = "Wageningen Academic Publishers",
pages = "S8",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology",
edition = "Supplement 1",

}

Tabor, G, Marlin, D & Williams, J 2018, Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training? in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology. Supplement 1 edn, vol. 14, Comparative Exercise Physiology, pp. S8, 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology, Lorne, Australia, 12/11/18. https://doi.org/10.3920/cep2018.s1

Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training? / Tabor, Gillian; Marlin, David; Williams, Jane.

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology. Vol. 14 Supplement 1. ed. 2018. p. S8 (Comparative Exercise Physiology).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training?

AU - Tabor, Gillian

AU - Marlin, David

AU - Williams, Jane

PY - 2018/10/23

Y1 - 2018/10/23

N2 - Optimal training requires understanding of exercise variables to achieve enhanced performance and progression. Rating of perceived exertion scales (RPE) are validated as proxy measures for physiological workload in human sport alongside Edwards’ training load. Edwards’ methodology is an algorithm using duration of time within defined heart rate (HR) zones. Both methods are validated to monitor Training load (TL) in human athletes. This study investigated if these methods could potentially offer a simple and repeatable measure of workload in equine training regimens. HR data (Polar V800) were obtained during one single exercise session from 32 horses across a range of equestrian disciplines with experienced riders and trainers, on different surfaces. Based on Edwards’ TL, duration (minutes) spent within five pre-defined training zones (1: <80; 2: 80-120; 3: 120-160; 4: 160-200; and 5: >200 bpm) were factored to obtain total TL (HRTL). Ratings (1:very,very easy-10:maximal) were collected from riders and trainers, reflecting horses’ RPE for entire sessions, then multiplied by exercise duration to determine internal TL (INHR). Spearman’s correlations (P<0.05) identified if relationships existed between HRTL and INHR. Statistically significant correlations between HR and INHR were found for both riders’ and trainers’ ratings of TL, riders: cohort: r=0.80, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.81, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.72, P=0.002; and trainers: cohort: r=0.82, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.89, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.94, P=0.0001. The results suggest HRTL and INHR can be used as inexpensive and easy tools to quantify TL and objectively assess progress in training. Exploration of optimal HR zone allocation for specific disciplines and breeds, alongside application of TL monitoring within equestrianism is warranted

AB - Optimal training requires understanding of exercise variables to achieve enhanced performance and progression. Rating of perceived exertion scales (RPE) are validated as proxy measures for physiological workload in human sport alongside Edwards’ training load. Edwards’ methodology is an algorithm using duration of time within defined heart rate (HR) zones. Both methods are validated to monitor Training load (TL) in human athletes. This study investigated if these methods could potentially offer a simple and repeatable measure of workload in equine training regimens. HR data (Polar V800) were obtained during one single exercise session from 32 horses across a range of equestrian disciplines with experienced riders and trainers, on different surfaces. Based on Edwards’ TL, duration (minutes) spent within five pre-defined training zones (1: <80; 2: 80-120; 3: 120-160; 4: 160-200; and 5: >200 bpm) were factored to obtain total TL (HRTL). Ratings (1:very,very easy-10:maximal) were collected from riders and trainers, reflecting horses’ RPE for entire sessions, then multiplied by exercise duration to determine internal TL (INHR). Spearman’s correlations (P<0.05) identified if relationships existed between HRTL and INHR. Statistically significant correlations between HR and INHR were found for both riders’ and trainers’ ratings of TL, riders: cohort: r=0.80, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.81, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.72, P=0.002; and trainers: cohort: r=0.82, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.89, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.94, P=0.0001. The results suggest HRTL and INHR can be used as inexpensive and easy tools to quantify TL and objectively assess progress in training. Exploration of optimal HR zone allocation for specific disciplines and breeds, alongside application of TL monitoring within equestrianism is warranted

U2 - 10.3920/cep2018.s1

DO - 10.3920/cep2018.s1

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 14

T3 - Comparative Exercise Physiology

SP - S8

BT - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology

ER -

Tabor G, Marlin D, Williams J. Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training? In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology. Supplement 1 ed. Vol. 14. 2018. p. S8. (Comparative Exercise Physiology). https://doi.org/10.3920/cep2018.s1