Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training?

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Abstract

    Optimal training requires understanding of exercise variables to achieve enhanced performance and progression. Rating of perceived exertion scales (RPE) are validated as proxy measures for physiological workload in human sport alongside Edwards’ training load. Edwards’ methodology is an algorithm using duration of time within defined heart rate (HR) zones. Both methods are validated to monitor Training load (TL) in human athletes. This study investigated if these methods could potentially offer a simple and repeatable measure of workload in equine training regimens. HR data (Polar V800) were obtained during one single exercise session from 32 horses across a range of equestrian disciplines with experienced riders and trainers, on different surfaces. Based on Edwards’ TL, duration (minutes) spent within five pre-defined training zones (1: <80; 2: 80-120; 3: 120-160; 4: 160-200; and 5: >200 bpm) were factored to obtain total TL (HRTL). Ratings (1:very,very easy-10:maximal) were collected from riders and trainers, reflecting horses’ RPE for entire sessions, then multiplied by exercise duration to determine internal TL (INHR). Spearman’s correlations (P<0.05) identified if relationships existed between HRTL and INHR. Statistically significant correlations between HR and INHR were found for both riders’ and trainers’ ratings of TL, riders: cohort: r=0.80, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.81, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.72, P=0.002; and trainers: cohort: r=0.82, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.89, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.94, P=0.0001. The results suggest HRTL and INHR can be used as inexpensive and easy tools to quantify TL and objectively assess progress in training. Exploration of optimal HR zone allocation for specific disciplines and breeds, alongside application of TL monitoring within equestrianism is warranted
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology
    PagesS8
    Number of pages1
    Volume14
    EditionSupplement 1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 23 Oct 2018
    Event10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology - Lorne, Australia
    Duration: 12 Nov 201816 Nov 2018

    Publication series

    NameComparative Exercise Physiology
    PublisherWageningen Academic Publishers
    ISSN (Print)1755-2540

    Conference

    Conference10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology
    CountryAustralia
    CityLorne
    Period12/11/1816/11/18

    Fingerprint

    Horses
    Heart Rate
    Sports
    Exercise
    Workload
    Proxy
    Athletes

    Cite this

    Tabor, G., Marlin, D., & Williams, J. (2018). Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training? In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology (Supplement 1 ed., Vol. 14, pp. S8). (Comparative Exercise Physiology). https://doi.org/10.3920/cep2018.s1
    Tabor, Gillian ; Marlin, David ; Williams, Jane. / Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training?. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology. Vol. 14 Supplement 1. ed. 2018. pp. S8 (Comparative Exercise Physiology).
    @inproceedings{4bad4cc55bf74f208ac0db04930179fc,
    title = "Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training?",
    abstract = "Optimal training requires understanding of exercise variables to achieve enhanced performance and progression. Rating of perceived exertion scales (RPE) are validated as proxy measures for physiological workload in human sport alongside Edwards’ training load. Edwards’ methodology is an algorithm using duration of time within defined heart rate (HR) zones. Both methods are validated to monitor Training load (TL) in human athletes. This study investigated if these methods could potentially offer a simple and repeatable measure of workload in equine training regimens. HR data (Polar V800) were obtained during one single exercise session from 32 horses across a range of equestrian disciplines with experienced riders and trainers, on different surfaces. Based on Edwards’ TL, duration (minutes) spent within five pre-defined training zones (1: <80; 2: 80-120; 3: 120-160; 4: 160-200; and 5: >200 bpm) were factored to obtain total TL (HRTL). Ratings (1:very,very easy-10:maximal) were collected from riders and trainers, reflecting horses’ RPE for entire sessions, then multiplied by exercise duration to determine internal TL (INHR). Spearman’s correlations (P<0.05) identified if relationships existed between HRTL and INHR. Statistically significant correlations between HR and INHR were found for both riders’ and trainers’ ratings of TL, riders: cohort: r=0.80, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.81, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.72, P=0.002; and trainers: cohort: r=0.82, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.89, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.94, P=0.0001. The results suggest HRTL and INHR can be used as inexpensive and easy tools to quantify TL and objectively assess progress in training. Exploration of optimal HR zone allocation for specific disciplines and breeds, alongside application of TL monitoring within equestrianism is warranted",
    author = "Gillian Tabor and David Marlin and Jane Williams",
    year = "2018",
    month = "10",
    day = "23",
    doi = "10.3920/cep2018.s1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "14",
    series = "Comparative Exercise Physiology",
    publisher = "Wageningen Academic Publishers",
    pages = "S8",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology",
    edition = "Supplement 1",

    }

    Tabor, G, Marlin, D & Williams, J 2018, Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training? in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology. Supplement 1 edn, vol. 14, Comparative Exercise Physiology, pp. S8, 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology, Lorne, Australia, 12/11/18. https://doi.org/10.3920/cep2018.s1

    Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training? / Tabor, Gillian; Marlin, David; Williams, Jane.

    Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology. Vol. 14 Supplement 1. ed. 2018. p. S8 (Comparative Exercise Physiology).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training?

    AU - Tabor, Gillian

    AU - Marlin, David

    AU - Williams, Jane

    PY - 2018/10/23

    Y1 - 2018/10/23

    N2 - Optimal training requires understanding of exercise variables to achieve enhanced performance and progression. Rating of perceived exertion scales (RPE) are validated as proxy measures for physiological workload in human sport alongside Edwards’ training load. Edwards’ methodology is an algorithm using duration of time within defined heart rate (HR) zones. Both methods are validated to monitor Training load (TL) in human athletes. This study investigated if these methods could potentially offer a simple and repeatable measure of workload in equine training regimens. HR data (Polar V800) were obtained during one single exercise session from 32 horses across a range of equestrian disciplines with experienced riders and trainers, on different surfaces. Based on Edwards’ TL, duration (minutes) spent within five pre-defined training zones (1: <80; 2: 80-120; 3: 120-160; 4: 160-200; and 5: >200 bpm) were factored to obtain total TL (HRTL). Ratings (1:very,very easy-10:maximal) were collected from riders and trainers, reflecting horses’ RPE for entire sessions, then multiplied by exercise duration to determine internal TL (INHR). Spearman’s correlations (P<0.05) identified if relationships existed between HRTL and INHR. Statistically significant correlations between HR and INHR were found for both riders’ and trainers’ ratings of TL, riders: cohort: r=0.80, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.81, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.72, P=0.002; and trainers: cohort: r=0.82, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.89, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.94, P=0.0001. The results suggest HRTL and INHR can be used as inexpensive and easy tools to quantify TL and objectively assess progress in training. Exploration of optimal HR zone allocation for specific disciplines and breeds, alongside application of TL monitoring within equestrianism is warranted

    AB - Optimal training requires understanding of exercise variables to achieve enhanced performance and progression. Rating of perceived exertion scales (RPE) are validated as proxy measures for physiological workload in human sport alongside Edwards’ training load. Edwards’ methodology is an algorithm using duration of time within defined heart rate (HR) zones. Both methods are validated to monitor Training load (TL) in human athletes. This study investigated if these methods could potentially offer a simple and repeatable measure of workload in equine training regimens. HR data (Polar V800) were obtained during one single exercise session from 32 horses across a range of equestrian disciplines with experienced riders and trainers, on different surfaces. Based on Edwards’ TL, duration (minutes) spent within five pre-defined training zones (1: <80; 2: 80-120; 3: 120-160; 4: 160-200; and 5: >200 bpm) were factored to obtain total TL (HRTL). Ratings (1:very,very easy-10:maximal) were collected from riders and trainers, reflecting horses’ RPE for entire sessions, then multiplied by exercise duration to determine internal TL (INHR). Spearman’s correlations (P<0.05) identified if relationships existed between HRTL and INHR. Statistically significant correlations between HR and INHR were found for both riders’ and trainers’ ratings of TL, riders: cohort: r=0.80, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.81, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.72, P=0.002; and trainers: cohort: r=0.82, P=0.0001; sports-horses: r=0.89, P=0.0001; racehorses: r=0.94, P=0.0001. The results suggest HRTL and INHR can be used as inexpensive and easy tools to quantify TL and objectively assess progress in training. Exploration of optimal HR zone allocation for specific disciplines and breeds, alongside application of TL monitoring within equestrianism is warranted

    U2 - 10.3920/cep2018.s1

    DO - 10.3920/cep2018.s1

    M3 - Conference contribution

    VL - 14

    T3 - Comparative Exercise Physiology

    SP - S8

    BT - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology

    ER -

    Tabor G, Marlin D, Williams J. Can human training load quantification be applied to equine training? In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Equine Exercise Physiology. Supplement 1 ed. Vol. 14. 2018. p. S8. (Comparative Exercise Physiology). https://doi.org/10.3920/cep2018.s1