Development and validation of the metacognitive beliefs about performances questionnaire

Steven Love, Lee Kannis-Dymand, Geoff Lovell

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a sport-specific self-report measure of metacognitive beliefs: The Metacognitive Beliefs about Performances Questionnaire (MBPQ). Firstly, principal components analysis and reliability tests showed that the MBPQ retained a reliable five-factor solution: positive beliefs about competitive worry; positive beliefs about rumination; positive beliefs about arousal; negative beliefs about competitive thinking; and beliefs about need to control cognition. Secondly, confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and validity tests confirmed internal validity in a triathlete field sample. Thirdly, concurrent validity was also evident through analyses of bivariate correlations with existing generalised metacognitive measures (the Metacognitions Questionnaire 30; the Adapted Positive Beliefs about Rumination Scale), and through associations with state anxiety variables (cognitive anxiety, somatic anxiety, thought disruption, and self-confidence). Overall, the results have conveyed the MBPQ to be a sound measure of metacognitive beliefs in competitive athletes. The implications and interactions of these subscales were discussed accordingly.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Sport Psychology
Volume50
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Development and validation of the metacognitive beliefs about performances questionnaire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this