Double blind carbohydrate ingestion does not improve exercise duration in warm humid conditions

Camila Nassif, Ana Paula Araujo Ferreira, Aline Regina Gomes, Luciana De Martin Silva, Emerson Silami Garcia, Frank E. Marino

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The positive effects of carbohydrate (CHO) supplementation on endurance exercise are well documented but the placebo (PLAc) effect can make the ergogenic qualities of substances more difficult to determine. Therefore, this study tested the effect of double blind ingestion of PLAcand CHOcin capsules versus known capsule (CHOk) ingestion on prolonged exercise heat stress. Nine well trained male volunteers (mean ± S.D.: 23 ± 3 years; 62.4 ± 6.5 kg and 65.8 ± 5.2 mL kg-1min-1peak oxygen consumption) exercised at 60% of maximum power output until volitional exhaustion (TTE) in the three different conditions. Capsules were ingested with 252 ± 39 mL of water. Blood glucose in CHOcand CHOkwas similar but higher (p <0.05) than PLAcfrom 45 min to end of exercise. There were no differences in TTE between PLAc(125.2 ± 37.1 min) or CHOc(138.8 ± 47.0 min) or between CHOcand CHOk(155.8 ± 54.2 min). Time to volitional exhaustion was different between PLAcand CHOk(p <0.05). Increased TTE resulted when participants and researchers knew the capsule content, but not in the double blind condition. The difference could be related to a combined effect of CHO ingestion and knowledge of what was ingested possibly acting as a potent psychological motivator. © 2007 Sports Medicine Australia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-79
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Capsules
Eating
Carbohydrates
Exercise
Performance-Enhancing Substances
Placebo Effect
Sports Medicine
Oxygen Consumption
Blood Glucose
Volunteers
Hot Temperature
Placebos
Research Personnel
Psychology
Water

Keywords

  • Carbohydrate
  • Exercise
  • Heat stress
  • Metabolism
  • Placebo
  • Rectal temperature

Cite this

Nassif, Camila ; Ferreira, Ana Paula Araujo ; Gomes, Aline Regina ; Silva, Luciana De Martin ; Garcia, Emerson Silami ; Marino, Frank E. / Double blind carbohydrate ingestion does not improve exercise duration in warm humid conditions. In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2008 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 72-79.
@article{4fc95376ae234661b196e9f2772351b8,
title = "Double blind carbohydrate ingestion does not improve exercise duration in warm humid conditions",
abstract = "The positive effects of carbohydrate (CHO) supplementation on endurance exercise are well documented but the placebo (PLAc) effect can make the ergogenic qualities of substances more difficult to determine. Therefore, this study tested the effect of double blind ingestion of PLAcand CHOcin capsules versus known capsule (CHOk) ingestion on prolonged exercise heat stress. Nine well trained male volunteers (mean ± S.D.: 23 ± 3 years; 62.4 ± 6.5 kg and 65.8 ± 5.2 mL kg-1min-1peak oxygen consumption) exercised at 60{\%} of maximum power output until volitional exhaustion (TTE) in the three different conditions. Capsules were ingested with 252 ± 39 mL of water. Blood glucose in CHOcand CHOkwas similar but higher (p <0.05) than PLAcfrom 45 min to end of exercise. There were no differences in TTE between PLAc(125.2 ± 37.1 min) or CHOc(138.8 ± 47.0 min) or between CHOcand CHOk(155.8 ± 54.2 min). Time to volitional exhaustion was different between PLAcand CHOk(p <0.05). Increased TTE resulted when participants and researchers knew the capsule content, but not in the double blind condition. The difference could be related to a combined effect of CHO ingestion and knowledge of what was ingested possibly acting as a potent psychological motivator. {\circledC} 2007 Sports Medicine Australia.",
keywords = "Carbohydrate, Exercise, Heat stress, Metabolism, Placebo, Rectal temperature",
author = "Camila Nassif and Ferreira, {Ana Paula Araujo} and Gomes, {Aline Regina} and Silva, {Luciana De Martin} and Garcia, {Emerson Silami} and Marino, {Frank E.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsams.2007.08.015",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "72--79",
journal = "Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport",
issn = "1440-2440",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Double blind carbohydrate ingestion does not improve exercise duration in warm humid conditions. / Nassif, Camila; Ferreira, Ana Paula Araujo; Gomes, Aline Regina; Silva, Luciana De Martin; Garcia, Emerson Silami; Marino, Frank E.

In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 72-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Double blind carbohydrate ingestion does not improve exercise duration in warm humid conditions

AU - Nassif, Camila

AU - Ferreira, Ana Paula Araujo

AU - Gomes, Aline Regina

AU - Silva, Luciana De Martin

AU - Garcia, Emerson Silami

AU - Marino, Frank E.

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - The positive effects of carbohydrate (CHO) supplementation on endurance exercise are well documented but the placebo (PLAc) effect can make the ergogenic qualities of substances more difficult to determine. Therefore, this study tested the effect of double blind ingestion of PLAcand CHOcin capsules versus known capsule (CHOk) ingestion on prolonged exercise heat stress. Nine well trained male volunteers (mean ± S.D.: 23 ± 3 years; 62.4 ± 6.5 kg and 65.8 ± 5.2 mL kg-1min-1peak oxygen consumption) exercised at 60% of maximum power output until volitional exhaustion (TTE) in the three different conditions. Capsules were ingested with 252 ± 39 mL of water. Blood glucose in CHOcand CHOkwas similar but higher (p <0.05) than PLAcfrom 45 min to end of exercise. There were no differences in TTE between PLAc(125.2 ± 37.1 min) or CHOc(138.8 ± 47.0 min) or between CHOcand CHOk(155.8 ± 54.2 min). Time to volitional exhaustion was different between PLAcand CHOk(p <0.05). Increased TTE resulted when participants and researchers knew the capsule content, but not in the double blind condition. The difference could be related to a combined effect of CHO ingestion and knowledge of what was ingested possibly acting as a potent psychological motivator. © 2007 Sports Medicine Australia.

AB - The positive effects of carbohydrate (CHO) supplementation on endurance exercise are well documented but the placebo (PLAc) effect can make the ergogenic qualities of substances more difficult to determine. Therefore, this study tested the effect of double blind ingestion of PLAcand CHOcin capsules versus known capsule (CHOk) ingestion on prolonged exercise heat stress. Nine well trained male volunteers (mean ± S.D.: 23 ± 3 years; 62.4 ± 6.5 kg and 65.8 ± 5.2 mL kg-1min-1peak oxygen consumption) exercised at 60% of maximum power output until volitional exhaustion (TTE) in the three different conditions. Capsules were ingested with 252 ± 39 mL of water. Blood glucose in CHOcand CHOkwas similar but higher (p <0.05) than PLAcfrom 45 min to end of exercise. There were no differences in TTE between PLAc(125.2 ± 37.1 min) or CHOc(138.8 ± 47.0 min) or between CHOcand CHOk(155.8 ± 54.2 min). Time to volitional exhaustion was different between PLAcand CHOk(p <0.05). Increased TTE resulted when participants and researchers knew the capsule content, but not in the double blind condition. The difference could be related to a combined effect of CHO ingestion and knowledge of what was ingested possibly acting as a potent psychological motivator. © 2007 Sports Medicine Australia.

KW - Carbohydrate

KW - Exercise

KW - Heat stress

KW - Metabolism

KW - Placebo

KW - Rectal temperature

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.08.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.08.015

M3 - Journal Article

VL - 11

SP - 72

EP - 79

JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

SN - 1440-2440

IS - 1

ER -