Effect of manual and motorized dental rasping instruments on Thoroughbred's heart rate and behavior

Jane Williams, Rachel Parrot, Fernando Mata

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Inadequate research exists to justify the choice of dental tools used in equine prophylactic dentistry; usage is unregulated, with choice usually based on the practitioner's preference. Dental procedures could cause stress (through handling or equipment used), as they are potentially painful if contact is made with soft-tissues. Anecdotally adverse reactions are documented and differ when comparing manual with motorized rasping, particularly during rasping the lower arcade. The study aimed to investigate these claims.Forty-five Thoroughbreds were divided into groups: (A): manual rasping, (B): motorized rasping, and (C): control. Horses were accustomed to prophylactic dentistry (6-12 months previously) and required a routine float. A standardized protocol was used; heart rate (HR) and scale-graded interactive behavioral responses (BR) were recorded to evaluate subjects' stress and pain pre-, peri-, and posttreatment.Increased HR and BR were observed in group A compared with groups B and C (P <0.001). Motorized rasping produced a significant increase in HR (P <0.001) and BR (P <0.001) from the controls. The results support postulation of higher sensitivity in the lower arcades, with these arcades exhibiting significantly higher HR and BR in both motorized and manual groups (P <0.001). " Bit-seating" recorded higher responses (HR and BR: P <0.001) compared with routine rasping.The study could inform routine dentistry; motorized rasping produced less-reactive horses, potentially providing a safer working environment for dental technicians and increased welfare for their equine patients. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-156
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Dental Instruments
heart rate
teeth
dentistry
Heart Rate
Horses
Dentistry
horses
Tooth
Dental Technicians
technicians
working conditions
pain
Pain
Equipment and Supplies
Research

Keywords

  • Behavior
  • Dentistry
  • Equine
  • Manual
  • Motorized
  • Rasping

Cite this

@article{3a32ede7daa54182b2889bbbb1e45d2f,
title = "Effect of manual and motorized dental rasping instruments on Thoroughbred's heart rate and behavior",
abstract = "Inadequate research exists to justify the choice of dental tools used in equine prophylactic dentistry; usage is unregulated, with choice usually based on the practitioner's preference. Dental procedures could cause stress (through handling or equipment used), as they are potentially painful if contact is made with soft-tissues. Anecdotally adverse reactions are documented and differ when comparing manual with motorized rasping, particularly during rasping the lower arcade. The study aimed to investigate these claims.Forty-five Thoroughbreds were divided into groups: (A): manual rasping, (B): motorized rasping, and (C): control. Horses were accustomed to prophylactic dentistry (6-12 months previously) and required a routine float. A standardized protocol was used; heart rate (HR) and scale-graded interactive behavioral responses (BR) were recorded to evaluate subjects' stress and pain pre-, peri-, and posttreatment.Increased HR and BR were observed in group A compared with groups B and C (P <0.001). Motorized rasping produced a significant increase in HR (P <0.001) and BR (P <0.001) from the controls. The results support postulation of higher sensitivity in the lower arcades, with these arcades exhibiting significantly higher HR and BR in both motorized and manual groups (P <0.001). {"} Bit-seating{"} recorded higher responses (HR and BR: P <0.001) compared with routine rasping.The study could inform routine dentistry; motorized rasping produced less-reactive horses, potentially providing a safer working environment for dental technicians and increased welfare for their equine patients. {\circledC} 2012 Elsevier Inc.",
keywords = "Behavior, Dentistry, Equine, Manual, Motorized, Rasping",
author = "Jane Williams and Rachel Parrot and Fernando Mata",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.007",
language = "English",
pages = "149--156",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research",
issn = "1558-7878",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

Effect of manual and motorized dental rasping instruments on Thoroughbred's heart rate and behavior. / Williams, Jane; Parrot, Rachel; Mata, Fernando.

In: Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 05.2012, p. 149-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of manual and motorized dental rasping instruments on Thoroughbred's heart rate and behavior

AU - Williams, Jane

AU - Parrot, Rachel

AU - Mata, Fernando

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Inadequate research exists to justify the choice of dental tools used in equine prophylactic dentistry; usage is unregulated, with choice usually based on the practitioner's preference. Dental procedures could cause stress (through handling or equipment used), as they are potentially painful if contact is made with soft-tissues. Anecdotally adverse reactions are documented and differ when comparing manual with motorized rasping, particularly during rasping the lower arcade. The study aimed to investigate these claims.Forty-five Thoroughbreds were divided into groups: (A): manual rasping, (B): motorized rasping, and (C): control. Horses were accustomed to prophylactic dentistry (6-12 months previously) and required a routine float. A standardized protocol was used; heart rate (HR) and scale-graded interactive behavioral responses (BR) were recorded to evaluate subjects' stress and pain pre-, peri-, and posttreatment.Increased HR and BR were observed in group A compared with groups B and C (P <0.001). Motorized rasping produced a significant increase in HR (P <0.001) and BR (P <0.001) from the controls. The results support postulation of higher sensitivity in the lower arcades, with these arcades exhibiting significantly higher HR and BR in both motorized and manual groups (P <0.001). " Bit-seating" recorded higher responses (HR and BR: P <0.001) compared with routine rasping.The study could inform routine dentistry; motorized rasping produced less-reactive horses, potentially providing a safer working environment for dental technicians and increased welfare for their equine patients. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.

AB - Inadequate research exists to justify the choice of dental tools used in equine prophylactic dentistry; usage is unregulated, with choice usually based on the practitioner's preference. Dental procedures could cause stress (through handling or equipment used), as they are potentially painful if contact is made with soft-tissues. Anecdotally adverse reactions are documented and differ when comparing manual with motorized rasping, particularly during rasping the lower arcade. The study aimed to investigate these claims.Forty-five Thoroughbreds were divided into groups: (A): manual rasping, (B): motorized rasping, and (C): control. Horses were accustomed to prophylactic dentistry (6-12 months previously) and required a routine float. A standardized protocol was used; heart rate (HR) and scale-graded interactive behavioral responses (BR) were recorded to evaluate subjects' stress and pain pre-, peri-, and posttreatment.Increased HR and BR were observed in group A compared with groups B and C (P <0.001). Motorized rasping produced a significant increase in HR (P <0.001) and BR (P <0.001) from the controls. The results support postulation of higher sensitivity in the lower arcades, with these arcades exhibiting significantly higher HR and BR in both motorized and manual groups (P <0.001). " Bit-seating" recorded higher responses (HR and BR: P <0.001) compared with routine rasping.The study could inform routine dentistry; motorized rasping produced less-reactive horses, potentially providing a safer working environment for dental technicians and increased welfare for their equine patients. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.

KW - Behavior

KW - Dentistry

KW - Equine

KW - Manual

KW - Motorized

KW - Rasping

U2 - 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.007

M3 - Journal Article

SP - 149

EP - 156

JO - Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research

JF - Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research

SN - 1558-7878

ER -