How and Why should Realist Review be implemented within Sport and Exercise Psychology? Illustrating the method

R. Hunter, T. Gorely, M. Beattie, Kevin Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

In the field of sport and exercise psychology, the systematic review is still considered by many, to be the gold standard literature review. However, reviews like these, which judge whether an intervention works or not, can leave many unanswered questions. When it comes to complex social interventions, failing to suggest reasons for an intervention’s efficacy, often means practitioners struggle to successfully implement research findings in the real world. This lack of detail has led many to question the utility of systematic reviews when examining behaviour change interventions in complex social environments. Realist reviews are increasing in popularity because they go beyond asking if an intervention works, to look for theories as to why a programme worked, who it worked for and in what context it worked. However, despite the growing popularity of realist reviews, there is still limited application of this approach across the sport and exercise sciences. This paper aims to increase awareness regarding the utility of realist research by offering an introduction to realist review and an explanation of the steps involved.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 23 Aug 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How and Why should Realist Review be implemented within Sport and Exercise Psychology? Illustrating the method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this