Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review

Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo, Cristian Álvarez, Antonio García-Hermoso, Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, Paulo Gentil, Abbas Asadi, Helmi Chaabene, Jason Moran, César Meylan, Antonio Garcia de Alcaraz, Javier Sánchez, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, Urs Granacher, William Kraemer, Mikel Izquierdo

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

7 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recently, there has been a proliferation of published articles on the effect of plyometric jump training including several review articles and meta-analyses. However, these types of research articles are generally of narrow scope. Furthermore, methodological limitations among studies (e.g., lack of active/passive control groups) prevent the generalization of results and these factors need to be addressed by researchers. On that basis, the aims of this scoping review were to i) characterize the main elements of plyometric jump training studies (e.g., training protocols), and ii) provide future directions for research. From 648 potentially relevant articles, 242 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The main issues identified related to: an insufficient number of studies conducted in females, youths and individual sports (~24.0%, ~37.0% and ~12.0% of overall studies, respectively); insufficient reporting of effect size values and training prescription (~34.0% and ~55.0% of overall studies, respectively); studies missing an active/passive control group and randomization (~40.0% and ~20.0% of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, plyometric jump training was often combined with other training methods and added to participants' daily training routines (~47.0% and ~39.0% of overall studies, respectively), thus distorting conclusions on its independent effects. Additionally, most studies lasted no longer than 7 weeks. In future, researchers are advised to conduct plyometric training studies of high methodological quality (e.g., randomized controlled trials). More research is needed in females, youth, and individual sports. Finally, the identification of specific dose-response relationships following plyometric training are needed to specifically tailor intervention programs, particularly in the long-term.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1059-1081
Number of pages22
JournalSports Medicine
Volume48
Issue number5
Early online date22 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

Plyometric Exercise
Research
Research Personnel
Control Groups
Random Allocation
Prescriptions
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Direction compound

Cite this

Ramírez-Campillo, R., Álvarez, C., García-Hermoso, A., Ramírez-Vélez, R., Gentil, P., Asadi, A., ... Izquierdo, M. (2018). Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review. Sports Medicine, 48(5), 1059-1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z
Ramírez-Campillo, Rodrigo ; Álvarez, Cristian ; García-Hermoso, Antonio ; Ramírez-Vélez, Robinson ; Gentil, Paulo ; Asadi, Abbas ; Chaabene, Helmi ; Moran, Jason ; Meylan, César ; Garcia de Alcaraz, Antonio ; Sánchez, Javier ; Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo ; Granacher, Urs ; Kraemer, William ; Izquierdo, Mikel. / Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review. In: Sports Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 48, No. 5. pp. 1059-1081.
@article{324273c3d81b4b72b938a5decceea456,
title = "Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review",
abstract = "Recently, there has been a proliferation of published articles on the effect of plyometric jump training including several review articles and meta-analyses. However, these types of research articles are generally of narrow scope. Furthermore, methodological limitations among studies (e.g., lack of active/passive control groups) prevent the generalization of results and these factors need to be addressed by researchers. On that basis, the aims of this scoping review were to i) characterize the main elements of plyometric jump training studies (e.g., training protocols), and ii) provide future directions for research. From 648 potentially relevant articles, 242 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The main issues identified related to: an insufficient number of studies conducted in females, youths and individual sports (~24.0{\%}, ~37.0{\%} and ~12.0{\%} of overall studies, respectively); insufficient reporting of effect size values and training prescription (~34.0{\%} and ~55.0{\%} of overall studies, respectively); studies missing an active/passive control group and randomization (~40.0{\%} and ~20.0{\%} of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, plyometric jump training was often combined with other training methods and added to participants' daily training routines (~47.0{\%} and ~39.0{\%} of overall studies, respectively), thus distorting conclusions on its independent effects. Additionally, most studies lasted no longer than 7 weeks. In future, researchers are advised to conduct plyometric training studies of high methodological quality (e.g., randomized controlled trials). More research is needed in females, youth, and individual sports. Finally, the identification of specific dose-response relationships following plyometric training are needed to specifically tailor intervention programs, particularly in the long-term.",
author = "Rodrigo Ram{\'i}rez-Campillo and Cristian {\'A}lvarez and Antonio Garc{\'i}a-Hermoso and Robinson Ram{\'i}rez-V{\'e}lez and Paulo Gentil and Abbas Asadi and Helmi Chaabene and Jason Moran and C{\'e}sar Meylan and {Garcia de Alcaraz}, Antonio and Javier S{\'a}nchez and Nakamura, {F{\'a}bio Yuzo} and Urs Granacher and William Kraemer and Mikel Izquierdo",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "1059--1081",
journal = "Sports Medicine",
issn = "0112-1642",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "5",

}

Ramírez-Campillo, R, Álvarez, C, García-Hermoso, A, Ramírez-Vélez, R, Gentil, P, Asadi, A, Chaabene, H, Moran, J, Meylan, C, Garcia de Alcaraz, A, Sánchez, J, Nakamura, FY, Granacher, U, Kraemer, W & Izquierdo, M 2018, 'Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review', Sports Medicine, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1059-1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z

Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review. / Ramírez-Campillo, Rodrigo; Álvarez, Cristian; García-Hermoso, Antonio; Ramírez-Vélez, Robinson; Gentil, Paulo; Asadi, Abbas; Chaabene, Helmi; Moran, Jason; Meylan, César; Garcia de Alcaraz, Antonio; Sánchez, Javier; Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo; Granacher, Urs; Kraemer, William; Izquierdo, Mikel.

In: Sports Medicine, Vol. 48, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 1059-1081.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review

AU - Ramírez-Campillo, Rodrigo

AU - Álvarez, Cristian

AU - García-Hermoso, Antonio

AU - Ramírez-Vélez, Robinson

AU - Gentil, Paulo

AU - Asadi, Abbas

AU - Chaabene, Helmi

AU - Moran, Jason

AU - Meylan, César

AU - Garcia de Alcaraz, Antonio

AU - Sánchez, Javier

AU - Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo

AU - Granacher, Urs

AU - Kraemer, William

AU - Izquierdo, Mikel

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Recently, there has been a proliferation of published articles on the effect of plyometric jump training including several review articles and meta-analyses. However, these types of research articles are generally of narrow scope. Furthermore, methodological limitations among studies (e.g., lack of active/passive control groups) prevent the generalization of results and these factors need to be addressed by researchers. On that basis, the aims of this scoping review were to i) characterize the main elements of plyometric jump training studies (e.g., training protocols), and ii) provide future directions for research. From 648 potentially relevant articles, 242 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The main issues identified related to: an insufficient number of studies conducted in females, youths and individual sports (~24.0%, ~37.0% and ~12.0% of overall studies, respectively); insufficient reporting of effect size values and training prescription (~34.0% and ~55.0% of overall studies, respectively); studies missing an active/passive control group and randomization (~40.0% and ~20.0% of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, plyometric jump training was often combined with other training methods and added to participants' daily training routines (~47.0% and ~39.0% of overall studies, respectively), thus distorting conclusions on its independent effects. Additionally, most studies lasted no longer than 7 weeks. In future, researchers are advised to conduct plyometric training studies of high methodological quality (e.g., randomized controlled trials). More research is needed in females, youth, and individual sports. Finally, the identification of specific dose-response relationships following plyometric training are needed to specifically tailor intervention programs, particularly in the long-term.

AB - Recently, there has been a proliferation of published articles on the effect of plyometric jump training including several review articles and meta-analyses. However, these types of research articles are generally of narrow scope. Furthermore, methodological limitations among studies (e.g., lack of active/passive control groups) prevent the generalization of results and these factors need to be addressed by researchers. On that basis, the aims of this scoping review were to i) characterize the main elements of plyometric jump training studies (e.g., training protocols), and ii) provide future directions for research. From 648 potentially relevant articles, 242 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The main issues identified related to: an insufficient number of studies conducted in females, youths and individual sports (~24.0%, ~37.0% and ~12.0% of overall studies, respectively); insufficient reporting of effect size values and training prescription (~34.0% and ~55.0% of overall studies, respectively); studies missing an active/passive control group and randomization (~40.0% and ~20.0% of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, plyometric jump training was often combined with other training methods and added to participants' daily training routines (~47.0% and ~39.0% of overall studies, respectively), thus distorting conclusions on its independent effects. Additionally, most studies lasted no longer than 7 weeks. In future, researchers are advised to conduct plyometric training studies of high methodological quality (e.g., randomized controlled trials). More research is needed in females, youth, and individual sports. Finally, the identification of specific dose-response relationships following plyometric training are needed to specifically tailor intervention programs, particularly in the long-term.

U2 - 10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z

DO - 10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z

M3 - Journal Article

VL - 48

SP - 1059

EP - 1081

JO - Sports Medicine

JF - Sports Medicine

SN - 0112-1642

IS - 5

ER -

Ramírez-Campillo R, Álvarez C, García-Hermoso A, Ramírez-Vélez R, Gentil P, Asadi A et al. Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review. Sports Medicine. 2018 May 1;48(5):1059-1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0870-z