The role of heart rate monitoring to assess workload during maintenance interval training in National Hunt racehorses

Jane Williams, Kieran Kenworthy, Tim Jones, David Marlin, Gillian Tabor

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quantitative assessment of racehorse workload and fitness levels can be achieved through heart rate monitoring (HRM), an established reliable indicator of workload. Using HRM can aid trainers in formulating evidence-based training regimes and evaluating individual horses’ progress during training. Despite this, HRM is not used consistently within racehorse training. This study aimed to evaluate how the maintenance workload of racehorses actively engaged in training and racing in the UK and varied across an interval-training regime (6 weeks). Ten thoroughbred racehorses (age: 9.1 ± 1.9 years) of mixed level (British Horseracing Authority Official Rating: 127.2 ± 7.95; career winnings: £34774.6 ± 21548.64) and experience in training (total races: 25 ± 12) were recruited for the study. Equinity Technology™ Ltd HRM systems collected weekly heart rate (HR) data for each horse during a maintenance interval training session (speed: 11 m/s) on a 3 furlong (0.38 m) all-weather gallop (sand, rubber, and wax mixture; 8 cm depth). Maintenance workload levels were determined by the same experienced National Hunt trainer; typical training sessions consisted of a warm up (walk and trot) to the gallop (1000 m) followed by a canter interval run: 0.38 km, after which horses walked 0.38 km back to the start; this process was then repeated a further two times. Mean HR, mean speed, and mean stride frequency (SF) for each run was recorded. Mean HR was used to calculate the mean percentage of HR maximum (%HRmax) for each horse between canter runs for individual training sessions and across the 6-week period. A series of one-way ANOVAs (significance: P <0.05) with post hoc paired t-tests (Bonferroni-adjusted alpha: P <0.01) examined if differences in %HRmean, mean speed, and mean SF occurred across the cohort and for individual horses. No significant differences in %HRmax, mean speed, or mean SF were found at the cohort or individual level (P > 0.05). The trainer rated all horses working at maintenance (aerobic) levels; however, descriptive analysis identified that 74%, 43%, and 2% of gallop runs exceeded the anaerobic threshold when set at 75%, 80%, and 85% of HRmax. The results provide evidence that HRM can provide trainers with a more accurate appraisal of racehorse workload compared to visual assessment during training. Increasing industry understanding of how HRM can be used to monitor fitness within training can enhance equine welfare by preparing horses appropriately for the demands of competition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-60
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
Volume30
Issue numberMarch-April
Early online date13 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

racehorses
Workload
heart rate
Heart Rate
Maintenance
Horses
monitoring
horses
Anaerobic Threshold
Waxes
Rubber
Weather
rubber
economic valuation
waxes
Analysis of Variance
Industry
weather
analysis of variance
sand

Keywords

  • training
  • horseracing
  • heart rate
  • fitness
  • equine
  • welfare

Cite this

@article{33dfa0c62e924b0d962fff158e70547f,
title = "The role of heart rate monitoring to assess workload during maintenance interval training in National Hunt racehorses",
abstract = "Quantitative assessment of racehorse workload and fitness levels can be achieved through heart rate monitoring (HRM), an established reliable indicator of workload. Using HRM can aid trainers in formulating evidence-based training regimes and evaluating individual horses’ progress during training. Despite this, HRM is not used consistently within racehorse training. This study aimed to evaluate how the maintenance workload of racehorses actively engaged in training and racing in the UK and varied across an interval-training regime (6 weeks). Ten thoroughbred racehorses (age: 9.1 ± 1.9 years) of mixed level (British Horseracing Authority Official Rating: 127.2 ± 7.95; career winnings: £34774.6 ± 21548.64) and experience in training (total races: 25 ± 12) were recruited for the study. Equinity Technology™ Ltd HRM systems collected weekly heart rate (HR) data for each horse during a maintenance interval training session (speed: 11 m/s) on a 3 furlong (0.38 m) all-weather gallop (sand, rubber, and wax mixture; 8 cm depth). Maintenance workload levels were determined by the same experienced National Hunt trainer; typical training sessions consisted of a warm up (walk and trot) to the gallop (1000 m) followed by a canter interval run: 0.38 km, after which horses walked 0.38 km back to the start; this process was then repeated a further two times. Mean HR, mean speed, and mean stride frequency (SF) for each run was recorded. Mean HR was used to calculate the mean percentage of HR maximum ({\%}HRmax) for each horse between canter runs for individual training sessions and across the 6-week period. A series of one-way ANOVAs (significance: P <0.05) with post hoc paired t-tests (Bonferroni-adjusted alpha: P <0.01) examined if differences in {\%}HRmean, mean speed, and mean SF occurred across the cohort and for individual horses. No significant differences in {\%}HRmax, mean speed, or mean SF were found at the cohort or individual level (P > 0.05). The trainer rated all horses working at maintenance (aerobic) levels; however, descriptive analysis identified that 74{\%}, 43{\%}, and 2{\%} of gallop runs exceeded the anaerobic threshold when set at 75{\%}, 80{\%}, and 85{\%} of HRmax. The results provide evidence that HRM can provide trainers with a more accurate appraisal of racehorse workload compared to visual assessment during training. Increasing industry understanding of how HRM can be used to monitor fitness within training can enhance equine welfare by preparing horses appropriately for the demands of competition.",
keywords = "training, horseracing, heart rate, fitness, equine, welfare",
author = "Jane Williams and Kieran Kenworthy and Tim Jones and David Marlin and Gillian Tabor",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jveb.2018.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "54--60",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research",
issn = "1558-7878",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "March-April",

}

The role of heart rate monitoring to assess workload during maintenance interval training in National Hunt racehorses. / Williams, Jane; Kenworthy, Kieran; Jones, Tim; Marlin, David; Tabor, Gillian.

In: Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, Vol. 30, No. March-April, 01.03.2019, p. 54-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of heart rate monitoring to assess workload during maintenance interval training in National Hunt racehorses

AU - Williams, Jane

AU - Kenworthy, Kieran

AU - Jones, Tim

AU - Marlin, David

AU - Tabor, Gillian

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Quantitative assessment of racehorse workload and fitness levels can be achieved through heart rate monitoring (HRM), an established reliable indicator of workload. Using HRM can aid trainers in formulating evidence-based training regimes and evaluating individual horses’ progress during training. Despite this, HRM is not used consistently within racehorse training. This study aimed to evaluate how the maintenance workload of racehorses actively engaged in training and racing in the UK and varied across an interval-training regime (6 weeks). Ten thoroughbred racehorses (age: 9.1 ± 1.9 years) of mixed level (British Horseracing Authority Official Rating: 127.2 ± 7.95; career winnings: £34774.6 ± 21548.64) and experience in training (total races: 25 ± 12) were recruited for the study. Equinity Technology™ Ltd HRM systems collected weekly heart rate (HR) data for each horse during a maintenance interval training session (speed: 11 m/s) on a 3 furlong (0.38 m) all-weather gallop (sand, rubber, and wax mixture; 8 cm depth). Maintenance workload levels were determined by the same experienced National Hunt trainer; typical training sessions consisted of a warm up (walk and trot) to the gallop (1000 m) followed by a canter interval run: 0.38 km, after which horses walked 0.38 km back to the start; this process was then repeated a further two times. Mean HR, mean speed, and mean stride frequency (SF) for each run was recorded. Mean HR was used to calculate the mean percentage of HR maximum (%HRmax) for each horse between canter runs for individual training sessions and across the 6-week period. A series of one-way ANOVAs (significance: P <0.05) with post hoc paired t-tests (Bonferroni-adjusted alpha: P <0.01) examined if differences in %HRmean, mean speed, and mean SF occurred across the cohort and for individual horses. No significant differences in %HRmax, mean speed, or mean SF were found at the cohort or individual level (P > 0.05). The trainer rated all horses working at maintenance (aerobic) levels; however, descriptive analysis identified that 74%, 43%, and 2% of gallop runs exceeded the anaerobic threshold when set at 75%, 80%, and 85% of HRmax. The results provide evidence that HRM can provide trainers with a more accurate appraisal of racehorse workload compared to visual assessment during training. Increasing industry understanding of how HRM can be used to monitor fitness within training can enhance equine welfare by preparing horses appropriately for the demands of competition.

AB - Quantitative assessment of racehorse workload and fitness levels can be achieved through heart rate monitoring (HRM), an established reliable indicator of workload. Using HRM can aid trainers in formulating evidence-based training regimes and evaluating individual horses’ progress during training. Despite this, HRM is not used consistently within racehorse training. This study aimed to evaluate how the maintenance workload of racehorses actively engaged in training and racing in the UK and varied across an interval-training regime (6 weeks). Ten thoroughbred racehorses (age: 9.1 ± 1.9 years) of mixed level (British Horseracing Authority Official Rating: 127.2 ± 7.95; career winnings: £34774.6 ± 21548.64) and experience in training (total races: 25 ± 12) were recruited for the study. Equinity Technology™ Ltd HRM systems collected weekly heart rate (HR) data for each horse during a maintenance interval training session (speed: 11 m/s) on a 3 furlong (0.38 m) all-weather gallop (sand, rubber, and wax mixture; 8 cm depth). Maintenance workload levels were determined by the same experienced National Hunt trainer; typical training sessions consisted of a warm up (walk and trot) to the gallop (1000 m) followed by a canter interval run: 0.38 km, after which horses walked 0.38 km back to the start; this process was then repeated a further two times. Mean HR, mean speed, and mean stride frequency (SF) for each run was recorded. Mean HR was used to calculate the mean percentage of HR maximum (%HRmax) for each horse between canter runs for individual training sessions and across the 6-week period. A series of one-way ANOVAs (significance: P <0.05) with post hoc paired t-tests (Bonferroni-adjusted alpha: P <0.01) examined if differences in %HRmean, mean speed, and mean SF occurred across the cohort and for individual horses. No significant differences in %HRmax, mean speed, or mean SF were found at the cohort or individual level (P > 0.05). The trainer rated all horses working at maintenance (aerobic) levels; however, descriptive analysis identified that 74%, 43%, and 2% of gallop runs exceeded the anaerobic threshold when set at 75%, 80%, and 85% of HRmax. The results provide evidence that HRM can provide trainers with a more accurate appraisal of racehorse workload compared to visual assessment during training. Increasing industry understanding of how HRM can be used to monitor fitness within training can enhance equine welfare by preparing horses appropriately for the demands of competition.

KW - training

KW - horseracing

KW - heart rate

KW - fitness

KW - equine

KW - welfare

U2 - 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.12.003

M3 - Journal Article

VL - 30

SP - 54

EP - 60

JO - Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research

JF - Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research

SN - 1558-7878

IS - March-April

ER -