The use of outcome measures in equine rehabilitation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The ideal goal of equine rehabilitation following injury or surgery is to return the horse to a level of function that either meets or exceeds the previous performance level and monitoring progress is important within rehabilitation. Outcome measures (OM) are used extensively in human practice and research, especially patient reported outcomes (PRO). PROs generally consist of a series of questions and observation of functional tasks, use of which may be challenging in equine practice.
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of OMs by physiotherapists in equine musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
Methods: A questionnaire was used to investigate how those involved with the treatment and training of horses measure progress and outcomes during rehabilitation.
Results: 71 physiotherapists responded, comprising 51 chartered physiotherapists and 20 physiotherapists without prior human training, with an average of 9.25 years in equine practice; 82.2% reported OM use. When asked to define an OM, 72.5% of chartered physiotherapists and 40% of physiotherapists without prior human training, matched a pre-set definition correctly. The benefits of OM use were reported consistently as a method
of objectively monitoring progress and used to adapt treatment plans. The barriers to OM use were lack of OM validation and reliability and time constraints. However, OMs were mainly subjective such as visual assessment of lameness, palpation and muscle symmetry.
Conclusion: In conclusion, confusion exists regarding what an OM is, and OM use is reported but often refers to subjective assessment method. A validated equine musculoskeletal rehabilitation score is required to support
clinical practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2-5
Number of pages4
JournalThe Veterinary Nurse
Volume9
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Horses
Rehabilitation
Physical Therapists
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Palpation
Observation
Muscles
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics
Research

Cite this

@article{b8438367f1894cc98f57831d707e6170,
title = "The use of outcome measures in equine rehabilitation",
abstract = "Background: The ideal goal of equine rehabilitation following injury or surgery is to return the horse to a level of function that either meets or exceeds the previous performance level and monitoring progress is important within rehabilitation. Outcome measures (OM) are used extensively in human practice and research, especially patient reported outcomes (PRO). PROs generally consist of a series of questions and observation of functional tasks, use of which may be challenging in equine practice.Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of OMs by physiotherapists in equine musculoskeletal rehabilitation.Methods: A questionnaire was used to investigate how those involved with the treatment and training of horses measure progress and outcomes during rehabilitation.Results: 71 physiotherapists responded, comprising 51 chartered physiotherapists and 20 physiotherapists without prior human training, with an average of 9.25 years in equine practice; 82.2{\%} reported OM use. When asked to define an OM, 72.5{\%} of chartered physiotherapists and 40{\%} of physiotherapists without prior human training, matched a pre-set definition correctly. The benefits of OM use were reported consistently as a methodof objectively monitoring progress and used to adapt treatment plans. The barriers to OM use were lack of OM validation and reliability and time constraints. However, OMs were mainly subjective such as visual assessment of lameness, palpation and muscle symmetry.Conclusion: In conclusion, confusion exists regarding what an OM is, and OM use is reported but often refers to subjective assessment method. A validated equine musculoskeletal rehabilitation score is required to supportclinical practice.",
author = "Gillian Tabor and Jane Williams",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.12968/vetn.2018.9.9.497",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "2--5",
journal = "The Veterinary Nurse",
issn = "2044-0065",
publisher = "Mark Allen Group",
number = "9",

}

The use of outcome measures in equine rehabilitation. / Tabor, Gillian; Williams, Jane.

In: The Veterinary Nurse, Vol. 9, No. 9, 02.11.2018, p. 2-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of outcome measures in equine rehabilitation

AU - Tabor, Gillian

AU - Williams, Jane

PY - 2018/11/2

Y1 - 2018/11/2

N2 - Background: The ideal goal of equine rehabilitation following injury or surgery is to return the horse to a level of function that either meets or exceeds the previous performance level and monitoring progress is important within rehabilitation. Outcome measures (OM) are used extensively in human practice and research, especially patient reported outcomes (PRO). PROs generally consist of a series of questions and observation of functional tasks, use of which may be challenging in equine practice.Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of OMs by physiotherapists in equine musculoskeletal rehabilitation.Methods: A questionnaire was used to investigate how those involved with the treatment and training of horses measure progress and outcomes during rehabilitation.Results: 71 physiotherapists responded, comprising 51 chartered physiotherapists and 20 physiotherapists without prior human training, with an average of 9.25 years in equine practice; 82.2% reported OM use. When asked to define an OM, 72.5% of chartered physiotherapists and 40% of physiotherapists without prior human training, matched a pre-set definition correctly. The benefits of OM use were reported consistently as a methodof objectively monitoring progress and used to adapt treatment plans. The barriers to OM use were lack of OM validation and reliability and time constraints. However, OMs were mainly subjective such as visual assessment of lameness, palpation and muscle symmetry.Conclusion: In conclusion, confusion exists regarding what an OM is, and OM use is reported but often refers to subjective assessment method. A validated equine musculoskeletal rehabilitation score is required to supportclinical practice.

AB - Background: The ideal goal of equine rehabilitation following injury or surgery is to return the horse to a level of function that either meets or exceeds the previous performance level and monitoring progress is important within rehabilitation. Outcome measures (OM) are used extensively in human practice and research, especially patient reported outcomes (PRO). PROs generally consist of a series of questions and observation of functional tasks, use of which may be challenging in equine practice.Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of OMs by physiotherapists in equine musculoskeletal rehabilitation.Methods: A questionnaire was used to investigate how those involved with the treatment and training of horses measure progress and outcomes during rehabilitation.Results: 71 physiotherapists responded, comprising 51 chartered physiotherapists and 20 physiotherapists without prior human training, with an average of 9.25 years in equine practice; 82.2% reported OM use. When asked to define an OM, 72.5% of chartered physiotherapists and 40% of physiotherapists without prior human training, matched a pre-set definition correctly. The benefits of OM use were reported consistently as a methodof objectively monitoring progress and used to adapt treatment plans. The barriers to OM use were lack of OM validation and reliability and time constraints. However, OMs were mainly subjective such as visual assessment of lameness, palpation and muscle symmetry.Conclusion: In conclusion, confusion exists regarding what an OM is, and OM use is reported but often refers to subjective assessment method. A validated equine musculoskeletal rehabilitation score is required to supportclinical practice.

U2 - 10.12968/vetn.2018.9.9.497

DO - 10.12968/vetn.2018.9.9.497

M3 - Journal Article

VL - 9

SP - 2

EP - 5

JO - The Veterinary Nurse

JF - The Veterinary Nurse

SN - 2044-0065

IS - 9

ER -