When is general wariness favored in avoiding multiple predator types?

Ben O. Brilot, Melissa Bateson, Daniel Nettle, Mark J. Whittingham, Jenny C.A. Read

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Adaptive responses to predation are generally studied assuming only one predator type exists, but most prey species are depredated by multiple types. When multiple types occur, the optimal antipredator response level may be determined solely by the probability of attack by the relevant predator: "specific responsiveness." Conversely, an increase in the probability of attack by one predator type might increase responsiveness to an alternative predator type: "general wariness." We formulate a mathematical model in which a prey animal perceives a cue providing information on the probability of two predator types being present. It can perform one of two evasive behaviors that vary in their suitability as a response to the "wrong" predator type. We show that general wariness is optimal when incorrect behavioral decisions have differential fitness costs. Counterintuitively, difficulty in discriminating between predator types does not favor general wariness. We predict that where responses to predator types are mutually exclusive (e.g., referential alarm-calling), specific responsiveness will occur; we suggest that prey generalize their defensive responses based on cue similarity due to an assumption of response utility; and we predict, with relevance to conservation, that habituation to human disturbance should generalize only to predators that elicit the same antipredator response as humans.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume179
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

predator
predators
habituation
fitness
mathematical models
predation
disturbance
animal
cost
animals

Keywords

  • Antipredator responses
  • General wariness
  • Human disturbance
  • Multiple predators
  • Predator generalization
  • Referential alarm calls

Cite this

Brilot, Ben O. ; Bateson, Melissa ; Nettle, Daniel ; Whittingham, Mark J. ; Read, Jenny C.A. / When is general wariness favored in avoiding multiple predator types?. In: American Naturalist. 2012 ; Vol. 179, No. 6.
@article{a570b63a61a24027b0a5ff4653cb79fc,
title = "When is general wariness favored in avoiding multiple predator types?",
abstract = "Adaptive responses to predation are generally studied assuming only one predator type exists, but most prey species are depredated by multiple types. When multiple types occur, the optimal antipredator response level may be determined solely by the probability of attack by the relevant predator: {"}specific responsiveness.{"} Conversely, an increase in the probability of attack by one predator type might increase responsiveness to an alternative predator type: {"}general wariness.{"} We formulate a mathematical model in which a prey animal perceives a cue providing information on the probability of two predator types being present. It can perform one of two evasive behaviors that vary in their suitability as a response to the {"}wrong{"} predator type. We show that general wariness is optimal when incorrect behavioral decisions have differential fitness costs. Counterintuitively, difficulty in discriminating between predator types does not favor general wariness. We predict that where responses to predator types are mutually exclusive (e.g., referential alarm-calling), specific responsiveness will occur; we suggest that prey generalize their defensive responses based on cue similarity due to an assumption of response utility; and we predict, with relevance to conservation, that habituation to human disturbance should generalize only to predators that elicit the same antipredator response as humans.",
keywords = "Antipredator responses, General wariness, Human disturbance, Multiple predators, Predator generalization, Referential alarm calls",
author = "Brilot, {Ben O.} and Melissa Bateson and Daniel Nettle and Whittingham, {Mark J.} and Read, {Jenny C.A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1086/665648",
language = "English",
volume = "179",
journal = "American Naturalist",
issn = "0003-0147",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "6",

}

When is general wariness favored in avoiding multiple predator types? / Brilot, Ben O.; Bateson, Melissa; Nettle, Daniel; Whittingham, Mark J.; Read, Jenny C.A.

In: American Naturalist, Vol. 179, No. 6, 06.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - When is general wariness favored in avoiding multiple predator types?

AU - Brilot, Ben O.

AU - Bateson, Melissa

AU - Nettle, Daniel

AU - Whittingham, Mark J.

AU - Read, Jenny C.A.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Adaptive responses to predation are generally studied assuming only one predator type exists, but most prey species are depredated by multiple types. When multiple types occur, the optimal antipredator response level may be determined solely by the probability of attack by the relevant predator: "specific responsiveness." Conversely, an increase in the probability of attack by one predator type might increase responsiveness to an alternative predator type: "general wariness." We formulate a mathematical model in which a prey animal perceives a cue providing information on the probability of two predator types being present. It can perform one of two evasive behaviors that vary in their suitability as a response to the "wrong" predator type. We show that general wariness is optimal when incorrect behavioral decisions have differential fitness costs. Counterintuitively, difficulty in discriminating between predator types does not favor general wariness. We predict that where responses to predator types are mutually exclusive (e.g., referential alarm-calling), specific responsiveness will occur; we suggest that prey generalize their defensive responses based on cue similarity due to an assumption of response utility; and we predict, with relevance to conservation, that habituation to human disturbance should generalize only to predators that elicit the same antipredator response as humans.

AB - Adaptive responses to predation are generally studied assuming only one predator type exists, but most prey species are depredated by multiple types. When multiple types occur, the optimal antipredator response level may be determined solely by the probability of attack by the relevant predator: "specific responsiveness." Conversely, an increase in the probability of attack by one predator type might increase responsiveness to an alternative predator type: "general wariness." We formulate a mathematical model in which a prey animal perceives a cue providing information on the probability of two predator types being present. It can perform one of two evasive behaviors that vary in their suitability as a response to the "wrong" predator type. We show that general wariness is optimal when incorrect behavioral decisions have differential fitness costs. Counterintuitively, difficulty in discriminating between predator types does not favor general wariness. We predict that where responses to predator types are mutually exclusive (e.g., referential alarm-calling), specific responsiveness will occur; we suggest that prey generalize their defensive responses based on cue similarity due to an assumption of response utility; and we predict, with relevance to conservation, that habituation to human disturbance should generalize only to predators that elicit the same antipredator response as humans.

KW - Antipredator responses

KW - General wariness

KW - Human disturbance

KW - Multiple predators

KW - Predator generalization

KW - Referential alarm calls

U2 - 10.1086/665648

DO - 10.1086/665648

M3 - Journal Article

VL - 179

JO - American Naturalist

JF - American Naturalist

SN - 0003-0147

IS - 6

ER -